Al Cleinman's Blog

Greetings. Thanks for reading my blog. Here you'll find ideas to help you develop your business…and your life. You'll also find observations and commentary. I've been a student of business for most of my life and have been playing "the Business of Optometry" for almost 40 years. I love debate. And I love ideas. I don't profess to have all the answers, but will always have an opinion. So, please don't hesitate to participate by adding your comments…your views are appreciated.
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
Subscribe

Al on Twitter

Recent Comments

  • No Thanks on Just Say No!
  • ian lane on What do you Sell?
  • mlb on The Dealer and the Junkie
  • No Thanks on The Dealer and the Junkie
  • Luke Skywalker on The Dealer and the Junkie
Apr23

Just Say No!

by Al on April 23rd, 2012 at 12:13 pm
Posted In: Current Affairs, Strategic Issues, VSP and Managed Care

In a recent announcement, MetLife has said it is moving forward with a new vision plan product.  As you read this, note that their PR release talks about the value of vision plans to employers and employees; but what’s missing is the value of such plans to the providers without whom the plan cannot exist.  Let me repeat this message…without providers, vision plans cannot exist.  AHC

NEW YORK—MetLife this week announced its new MetLife Vision PPO product as a complement to its other workplace products. The offering is available to employers in all 50 States with 10 or more eligible employees, subject to regulatory approval in certain states.

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) is a subsidiary of MetLife, Inc., a leading global provider of insurance, annuities and employee benefit programs, serving 90 million customers in over 50 countries.

“Adding a vision benefit designed from the latest research and industry innovations is a win-win for employers and their employees. Vision coverage can help employers leverage their benefits programs to manage health care costs and increase employee satisfaction to help attract and retain a productive workforce,” said Michael Schwartz, vice president, MetLife Dental and Vision Products.

“Vision benefits that offer employees real savings as well as choice and convenience for receiving services, can help them obtain the care they need now and prevent costlier issues later through early detection.” He added, “With today’s market environment—growth in the voluntary benefits market as well as a focus on overall health—we believe there are significant opportunities for growth in vision as well as MetLife’s other non-medical employee benefits.”

Schwartz told VMail, “The network is a critical component to providing customers with the choice and convenience they value in a vision plan—access to all types of providers is second only to savings as the most important feature (according to Jobson Optical Research). We’re focused on ensuring that members have the choice and convenience of a high quality, extensive network of ophthalmologists, optometrists and opticians working out of full-service private practice and retail chain locations.”

Schwartz added, “Vision is a valued employee benefit—84 percent of employees state that this benefit is important to them—and employees who own this benefit are nearly twice as likely to be satisfied with their benefits program (according to MetLife’s Annual Employee Benefits Trends study). So in following our approach for dental plans, we’ve leveraged research and market trend information to help guide our approach to our vision plan designs. We believe the MetLife Vision plans are competitive providing the value our customers expect from MetLife.”

MetLife said its vision plan offers flexibility for employers to select from a wide range of plan designs to best fit their needs—including choice of service frequency, exam copay, materials copay and frame/contact lens allowance, industry-leading standard features as well as employee decision support tools and wellness programs and ease of administration, with integrated, simplified implementation, billing and customer service, by adding a vision plan alongside another new or existing MetLife benefit plan.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

1 Comment
Mar17

What do you Sell?

by Al on March 17th, 2012 at 11:06 am
Posted In: Inspiration, Marketing and Business Development, Strategic Issues

On a recent trip to Costa Rica, I came across two small boys at a shop near the cloud forests of Monteverde.   These very precocious and animated children came up to me with a warm greeting.  “Hello, Mr.”, one said  in perfect english holding an open wooden box.  “We will sell you three of these coins for one dollar.”  

Always interested in a bargain and being a lifelong entrepreneur, I enjoy interacting with enterprising children.  I am a sucker for lemonade stands, bake sales, car washes and the like.  I love to encourage entrepreneurship. 

In this particular case, I was especially enamored of Hector and Roberto.   They carried a small box that held their various coins and a couple of U.S. dollars.  They proudly showed me their collection and told me “this is fifty and this one is a hundred” as they turned the coins over and showed me the pictures on each.  They demonstrated the colors and shapes as we enjoyed an animated repartee over what they had to sell and what I was willing to spend for it.  Now 1 U.S. dollar is worth about 500 colones, but these boys didn’t blink an eye as they offered me the equivalent of about 25 cents for my dollar.  It made no diference to them that I could get these coins as change everywhere else.  Even at their young age, Hector and Roberto seemed to understand the true meaning of value.

In the end, I turned over $10 u.s. dollars for about $1 worth of coins…which I immediately returned to them so they could sell them to another “customer.”  Bottom line…I gave them $10 and received nothing tangible in return.  But I was pleased, indeed thrilled, to do so.

As I contemplated this exchange during the rest of our trip, I thought about the meaning of value.  In reality, Hector and Roberto provided me with the equivalent of a couple of nickles and a dime in exchange for $10.   But the coins weren’t their product…and I wasn’t a sucker.  I knew what I was doing and Hector and Roberto knew what they were selling.   I turned over my currency in exchange for an enjoyable fifteen minute exchange with a couple of animated and charming young men who talked about their product, and their beautiful country, with a level of confidence beyond their young age.   And that, to me, was priceless.  I was the one who got the best deal.   Yes, I could obtain a few colones anywhere for par.  But I couldn’t get Hector and Roberto anywhere else.   Hector and Roberto weren’t selling coins…they were selling themselves.

In today’s world, so many of my readers struggle with concern about patients taking their Rxs and heading off to the internet to buy the “same product” for less.  But taking a lesson from Hector and Roberto, I ask you to step back and consider what it is that you sell.  Do you really sell eyewear or an eye exam?   I don’t think so.  

The reality is that you sell YOU…and if you’re smart, you’ll make YOU a unique experience.   And if you invest in your patient experience and make it something truly special and memorable, your patients won’t go anywhere else.  Sure, some may go off and look for the bargain…but they’ll be back.  Like Hector and Roberto selling coins that can be obtained anywhere, consumers can get frames and lenses anywhere.  But they can’t get YOU anywhere.  They can’t get YOU down the street.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

1 Comment
Feb09

The Dealer and the Junkie

by Al on February 9th, 2012 at 3:48 am
Posted In: Current Affairs, Marketing and Business Development, Strategic Issues, VSP and Managed Care

Back in the day, Vision Plan was developed as a methodology for selling the services of its owner, the profession of optometry.  Vision Plan acted as optometry’s agent; effectively owned and controlled by the profession itself.  Vision Plan represented an efficient institutional marketing effort; a sophisticated marketing tool utilized by otherwise unsophisticated marketers.  Reimbursements were reasonable and the fee reductions associated represented an effective use of marketing monies.  For the typical optometrist ten years ago,  such discounting represented around 11% of revenue.  This expense is a sales cost, as Vision Plan is “paid” this money in exchange for patients.  And an 11% cost of sales was a reasonable investment to put “butts in seats.”

As the marketplace has evolved, four interesting and dramatic phenomena have developed.

Greed:  First, the premium dollars paid to Vision Plan by employers grew to billions of dollars.  Vision Plan employees saw this pot of gold.  So, Vision Plan figured out how to change their  structure to disengage control from the profession that launched it and place that control in the hands of Vision Plan itself.  Today, Vision Plan clearly operates, not for the benefit of its Providers and former “owners,” but for the sole benefit of Vision Plan.  So says the Supreme Court.

Back to billion$; these monies are invested in a variety of ways to create additional earnings for Vision Plan.  Companies were purchased.  Beautiful buildings were acquired.  Technology was developed.  Employees were paid exceptionally well with benefits that earned Vision Plan an outstanding reputation; one of the best in the nation.  All this occurred while Provider reimbursements languished at 1980’s rates.  It’s important to note that Warren Buffett created his amazing investment vehicle with insurance premiums.  Vision Plan is no dummy.

As the monies flowed, it’s clear that greed became the driving force for Vision Plan.  And why not?  With Vision Plan now controlling almost 1 of every 6 of optometry’s potential patients, and as much as 8 of every 10 in some markets, it’s easy to understand how Vision Plan might think that they invented the ultimate economic engine.   And because Providers are addicted to more and more patients, maintaining the “we’re here for you” mantra was easy.  Today, some 25,000 optometrist “addicts” are, sadly, hooked on the drug of the Vision Plan “dealer.”

Naiveté:  Now, as time marched on, there evolved a second force.  I’ll term this force “marketing naiveté.”  With Vision Plan supposedly delivering so many patients, Providers didn’t have to develop or execute marketing programs like other businesses. They could sit back and rely upon the volume delivered by Vision Plan to fill their books.  “Who cares whether the patient is profitable, we’ll make it up on volume,” they said.

Just as the addict is hooked to the dealer, Providers got hooked on Vision Plan.

But soon others saw the power of Vision Plan and wanted in on the opportunity.  More dealers arrived on the scene; driving the value of the drug (patients) downward.   And soon, others offered the drug in a different way, at even deeper discounts. Big box retailers got in the game. Internet delivery arrived.  Vision Plan had competition.

Just as the dealer does to the junkie, Vision Plan began taking more and more from the Providers.

“We have to compete,” they said, “we’re working hard for you so that those big  bad competitors don’t take away your patients.”
“We’ll sell our plan to individuals.”
“We’ll install retail locations within large employer sites.”

“We’ll set up internet delivery.”

“We’re on your side,” Vision Plan said.

The Coffin Door:  Vision Plan has an incredible asset, the names and contact information of tens of millions of Provider’s patients.   Vision Plan has frames; they own the largest U.S. distributor.  They own the labs to produce lenses.  And, as a result of acquisition (using premium dollars and the margins squeezed from Provider’s pockets through under-cost reimbursements), Vision Plan purchased the software firm that is used by thousands of its Providers. So, Vision Plan has all the eyewear and technology links it needs to service its many millions of patients. Ever concerned about Provider’s ability to compete, Vision Plan “helped” Providers by implementing an on-line purchasing site.  This was done so that Providers could compete in the cruel modern marketplace.  Is it coincidence that Vision Plan retired its old guard leadership and promoted its former Chief Technology Officer to the CEO position?

Starting to get the picture?

The Critical Battle:  Finally, Vision Plan is now openly fighting with the very Profession that birthed it. Where do Provider’s services belong in the new health care environment?  Should vision care be a carve-out, available only through Vision Plan and its “benevolent” competitors?  Or should vision care be part of main-stream health care just like all other physician services?  Optometrists aren’t real doctors, are they? Just 10 years ago, the typical Provider “junkie” was paying about 11% of sales to the “dealer” to feed their patient volume “habit.”  Today, that number is closer to 35% and climbing.  And as reimbursements continue to languish at 1980 levels, it’s ironic that the need for ever-increasing investments to deliver the very best level of care is increasing.  New technology is needed.  Better trained staff is critical.  More modern and enjoyable facilities are required to compete.  With costs continuing to rise and reimbursements effectively declining, Vision Plan’s Providers are finding themselves in a financial squeeze.

What a horrible situation for Vision Plan!

Or is it?

Simply stated, one can conclude that Vision Plan is very happy to have Providers earning less and needing more.  Isn’t that what fuels further reliance on the “dealer?”  Provider has an apparent insatiable appetite for more patients because without more patients Provider can’t maintain past income levels.  Provider is hooked on Vision Plan.

But the Vision Plan “drug” has become too expensive.   The “dealer” is almost completely controlling the “junkie.”  And next, the “dealer” will dramatically reduce their need for the “junkie” by selling their products directly to the consumer via their internet-based initiative.  Of course, they’ll throw a crumb to the junkie in the form of dispensing fees. This will serve to keep the Junkie hooked on the Vision Plan “drug.”

The fox long ago entered the henhouse.

What’s sad about this situation is that progressive optometrists can do so much better than life within vision plans. Sure, it takes some confidence; a conscientious approach to service; and attention to the details of marketing and merchandising.  But there are many former Providers who have proven that there’s life after Vision Plan.

“I dis-enrolled with VSP one year ago. My gross charges are actually down a bit this year – by almost exactly my amount of VSP charges last year. My net, however, is almost exactly the same as last year. So I am working less and making the same money. Correlation does not mean causation, but it is a heck of a coincidence, isn’t
it?

Would I like to have my net up? Sure – who wouldn’t? But it hasn’t gone down. And I have much more room to grow my practice this way.”     Dr. Don Furman, Iowa

It’s clear that vision care belongs within main stream healthcare.  And I’m confident that once enough individual optometrists take action with a “we’re sick and tired and not going to take it anymore” attitude, vision plans will either change their ways or be relegated to compete with all those other discount retailers that exist in every market; and against which optometrists have very successfully learned to compete.  Certainly, the consumer doesn’t need vision plans to acquire affordable eyecare.

It’s clear that vision plans are “brand destroyers.”  If the only reason that our industry can sell our services and products is with a deep discount, we have over-valued our own product/service.  Personally, I don’t think this is the case…but most Providers and Vision Plan acts like it is.

It’s time to take back your brand.

It’s time to stop being afraid of life without Vision Plans.

It’s time to recognize that Vision Plans have outlived their usefulness to the Providers who birthed them.

It’s time to get on a 12 step program and wean from this very expensive addiction.

Author’s Note:  My use of the term “junkie” is intended to make a point and not meant with any disrespect for the profession that I have served for almost forty years.  I have written extensively about vision plans (for more about Vision Plans, simply click on the “VSP and Managed Care” category at the top right corner of this page) and I thank my readers for passing on my blog. I encourage you to read the immediate prior post which details activities of importance at the state level.  I encourage every optometrist to get involved with the AOA at your state and federal level to support the battle for your future involvement in mainstream healthcare. 

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

└ Tags: Optometry, Vision Plans, VSP
14 Comments
Jan18

How to Eat an 800# Gorilla

by Al on January 18th, 2012 at 9:46 pm
Posted In: Current Affairs, Improving Financial Performance, Leadership, Marketing and Business Development, Rants and Raves, Strategic Issues, VSP and Managed Care

I have often commented that most vision plan’s contractual requirement that providers extend a discount for all services, regardless of coverage, is both patently unfair and a brand-destroyer.  Well, apparently our friends in dentistry have seen the light.  Dentistry appears to have their act together on this issue and optometry can take a lesson from their efforts.  What follows is a legislative report from the American Dental Association.

ADA State Legislative Report – Dec. 2011 / Jan. 2012
Issue

Non-Covered Services

 Twenty-four states filed a bill in 2011 to limit or prohibit dental benefit plans from capping the fees a contracting dentist may charge for non-covered services. Ten of them enacted their law this year (Arkansas, Connecticut (sec 19), Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming). Bills are pending in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts.

As mentioned a few months ago, a significant milestone was met in June when the 25th state (Texas) enacted a non-covered services law. Just a few weeks later, Connecticut became the 26th state to enact an NCS law. Now, over half the states have such a law in just two years of campaigns to
achieve the enactments. Always worthy of repeating, nearly all of the votes on NCS bills have been unanimous.

Opposition has historically come from insurers, though sometimes not as vehement as opposition from unions, particularly state employee unions, and small business interests in some states. The basic message in opposition has been one where costs would increase for consumers. State dental associations were able to explain that the costs would not really rise, but would be set at the dentists’ regular rate. Concerns over cost shifting to uninsured also resonated on some state advocacy campaigns.

Some plans are offering dentists the option to sign (or otherwise select) a capped fee contract for non-covered service fees. Although the particular states where this is a trend actually have an NCS law prohibiting plans from capping non-covered service fees, the plans offer that very option
to dentists.

The ADA is following this trend very closely and will keep you posted.

While our friends at the AOA have a lot on their plate and a taking up the fight directly with VSP, it seems that state associations have an opportunity at the local level.  I’m told that several states are working on this very issue and that success is expected.

So, while you can’t ignore the 800 pound gorilla, I do believe that you can destroy him the same way he was built…one state at a time.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

└ Tags: Dental Plans, Discounts, Vision Plans, VSP
2 Comments
Dec29

Success in 2012 – Yours for the Action

by Al on December 29th, 2011 at 11:40 pm
Posted In: Building A Winning Team, Current Affairs, Improving Financial Performance, Inspiration, Leadership, Marketing and Business Development, Strategic Issues

 Over the past few years, I’ve traveled throughout North America presenting a workshop entitled “Secrets of High Performing Practices” at our Business of Eyecare Forum programs.  At the beginning of this workshop that explores the strategies behind success, I pull out a $100 bill and ask my audience; “who wants this?”   Invariably, I get a show of hands and even a few shouts from the audience.  Then, after a few repeats of my question, someone will finally come up and grab the $100 out of my hand.  Sometimes it takes a bit of coaxing.

As I look back on 2011; a year during which some of my readers have had significant challenges while others have been incredibly successful; my thoughts go to that giveaway exercise.

What makes for success?  As I’ve thought about 2011’s winners and losers, my conclusion is that the difference between success and mediocrity boils down to simply taking action.  Some of you have sat on the sidelines this year, waiting for the economy to turn.  Others have sought out new opportunities and taken action with hiring, business development initiatives, new products and even acquisitions. Those folks that took action have seen their initiatives rewarded.

So, as we head off to the new year celebration, I send my best wishes to you and yours for an enjoyable and restful New Year holiday.  And I ask that, during this and the coming weeks, if not already done, please invest the time to deeply consider what actions you’ll take in 2012 to ensure your success in this and the years that follow.

Success is yours…for the action!

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

└ Tags: 2012, Action, Initiative, Optometry, Success
 Comment 
  • Page 1 of 44
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • »
  • Last »

Categories

  • Books
  • Building A Winning Team
  • Current Affairs
  • Getting a Life
  • Improving Financial Performance
  • Inspiration
  • Leadership
  • Life's Ironies
  • Marketing and Business Development
  • Rants and Raves
  • Strategic Issues
  • Uncategorized
  • VSP and Managed Care

Archives

  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008

©2008-2012 Al Cleinman's Blog | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑